<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHP Markdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ethilien.net/archives/php-markdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ethilien.net/archives/php-markdown/</link>
	<description>I need to redo this site...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Connor</title>
		<link>http://ethilien.net/archives/php-markdown/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethilien.net/archives/php-markdown/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have looked at textile before, but I really don't like its syntax very much (as you said, its a pain to memorize keywords).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With markdown, there are no keywords. Everything is just paragraph breaks, pound signs, and asterisks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have looked at textile before, but I really don&#8217;t like its syntax very much (as you said, its a pain to memorize keywords).</p>

<p>With markdown, there are no keywords. Everything is just paragraph breaks, pound signs, and asterisks.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://ethilien.net/archives/php-markdown/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethilien.net/archives/php-markdown/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, the wordpress editor is kind of bad. IMO, browser based rich text editors are usually bad. Have you heard of textile? It is the same concept, it just uses a different syntax. http://textism.com/tools/textile/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That's what I usually use for posting to my blog. It works pretty well. The only pain is memorizing the commands.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the wordpress editor is kind of bad. IMO, browser based rich text editors are usually bad. Have you heard of textile? It is the same concept, it just uses a different syntax. <a href="http://textism.com/tools/textile/" rel="nofollow">http://textism.com/tools/textile/</a></p>

<p>That&#8217;s what I usually use for posting to my blog. It works pretty well. The only pain is memorizing the commands.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dakota</title>
		<link>http://ethilien.net/archives/php-markdown/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethilien.net/archives/php-markdown/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I cannot say that I am a big fan of WP's RichText editor either. I'll be looking into this plugin...normally I just use plain HTML.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot say that I am a big fan of WP&#8217;s RichText editor either. I&#8217;ll be looking into this plugin&#8230;normally I just use plain HTML.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
